In re the Claim of Schmerzler

226 A.D.2d 853, 640 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3694
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 11, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 7, 1994, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

While collecting unemployment insurance benefits, claimant, an architect, formed a professional corporation. The Board [854] subsequently found him ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he was not totally unemployed, charged him with a recoverable overpayment of benefits in the amount of $2,325 and reduced his right to future benefits. At the hearing, claimant admitted that he formed the corporation, established an office and spent time in the office on a daily basis while he was receiving unemployment insurance benefits. However, he failed to report this activity to the local unemployment insurance office. In view of this testimony, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision (see, Matter of Kaufman [Hartnett], 178 AD2d 882).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Schmerzler, 226 A.D.2d 853, 640 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 853 (In re the Claim of Schmerzler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Khurgin
232 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
In re the Claim of Casamassa
231 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)