In re the Claim of Schmahman

278 A.D. 625, 101 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4123
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 16, 1951
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 278 A.D. 625 (In re the Claim of Schmahman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Schmahman, 278 A.D. 625, 101 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4123 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

Appeal by the Industrial Commissioner from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which affirmed a decision of a referee which, in turn, had overruled an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive [626]*626benefits for an indefinite period commencing September 19, 1949, on the ground that he was unavailable for employment. Claimant had been engaged in the restaurant business for many years as an employee and owner. He was last employed prior to 1938; after that he was in business for himself until July, 1948. Approximately a year later he filed a claim for benefits on July 18, 1949. Although the evidence rather strongly indicates that he was seeking to purchase another business rather than employment, nevertheless there is some evidence that he was looking for employment. He attached to his quest a condition that he would only work five hours a day, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., or from 12:00 to 5:00 p.m. The board, in addition to adopting the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the referee, made the additional finding that there were establishments located in the financial and business districts of New York city which might have utilized claimant’s services during the hours from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. We find no substantial evidence to sustain this finding, or to sustain the conclusion that claimant was available for employment within the meaning of the statute. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reversed, on the law, and the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner reinstated, without costs. Foster, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Bergan and Coon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

North Miami General Hospital Inc. v. Plaza
432 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
NORTH MIAMI GEN. HOSP. INC. v. Plaza
432 So. 2d 723 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Texas Employment Commission v. Hays
360 S.W.2d 525 (Texas Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 625, 101 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-schmahman-nyappdiv-1951.