In re the Claim of Schifferle

33 A.D.2d 847, 305 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2601
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 1969·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 24, 1969, disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits. Appellant, an employee of the United States Post Office, was also a full-time college student. When a change in his working hours presented a conflict with his school work, he quit his job. The board’s finding that “ claimant left his employment for a personal, non-compelling reason, which does not constitute good cause within the meaning of the law”, is supported by substantial evidence and must be upheld. The determination of the Federal agency as to the reason for appellant’s separation from employment, as [848] Resignation further education ’ ” is binding on the board. (IT. S. Code, tit. 5, § 8506; Matter of Miller [Catherwood], 30 A D' 2d 610.) “ The subsidization of an employee’s education is not among the purposes of the unemployment insurance act.” (Matter of Dreistadt [Catherwood], 29 A D 2d 807.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Schifferle, 33 A.D.2d 847, 305 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

33 A.D.2d 847 (In re the Claim of Schifferle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Silberman
17 A.D.3d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
In re the Claim of Weremblewski
193 A.D.2d 1030 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Claim of Novak
190 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Fox v. Woodbridge Township Board of Education
488 A.2d 1020 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1985)
In re the Claim of Manning
59 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
In re the Claim of Toliver
51 A.D.2d 600 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Claim of Christophe
50 A.D.2d 705 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)