In re the Claim of Sarmanokian

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Sarmanokian

213 A.D.2d 956, 624 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3340

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 213 A.D.2d 956 (In re the Claim of Sarmanokian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Sarmanokian, 213 A.D.2d 956, 624 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 29, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Board upon its own motion for the purpose of determining whether there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [SD NY]). The Board found no substantial procedural violations and, therefore, adhered to its prior decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. The procedural errors asserted by claimant are unpersuasive and we conclude that the Board’s decision must be upheld.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 29, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Board upon its own motion for the purpose of determining whether there had been compliance with the procedural safeguards set forth in the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [SD NY]). The Board found no substantial procedural violations and, therefore, adhered to its prior decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. The procedural errors asserted by claimant are unpersuasive and we conclude that the Board’s decision must be upheld.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr., Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 956, 624 N.Y.S.2d 978, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-sarmanokian-nyappdiv-1995.