In re the Claim of Sandler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Sandler

22 A.D.2d 740, 253 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2938

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 22 A.D.2d 740 (In re the Claim of Sandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Sandler, 22 A.D.2d 740, 253 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

What constitutes good cause within subdivision 1 of section 593 of the Labor Law regarding disqualification for unemployment compensation in eases of voluntary separation is a question of fact (Matter of Sperling [Catherwood], 20 A D 2d 584). The resolution of factual issues is within the province of the board if supported by substantial evidence (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Jacobson [Catherwood], 20 A D 2d 733). On the present record we are without authority to disturb the board’s determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

What constitutes good cause within subdivision 1 of section 593 of the Labor Law regarding disqualification for unemployment compensation in eases of voluntary separation is a question of fact (Matter of Sperling [Catherwood], 20 A D 2d 584). The resolution of factual issues is within the province of the board if supported by substantial evidence (Labor Law, § 623; Matter of Jacobson [Catherwood], 20 A D 2d 733). On the present record we are without authority to disturb the board’s determination. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 A.D.2d 740, 253 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-sandler-nyappdiv-1964.