In re the Claim of Sanders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Sanders

224 A.D.2d 896, 638 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1497

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 29, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 896 (In re the Claim of Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Sanders, 224 A.D.2d 896, 638 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1497 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 23, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a production worker at a manufacturing plant, injured her finger while operating heavy machinery. After having her injury bandaged at work, claimant became upset when her employer would not permit another employee to drive her to a medical clinic. Claimant drove herself to the clinic and subsequently resigned from her position. The Board denied claimants application for unemployment insurance benefits, finding that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We find that the Board’s decision is sup[897]*897ported by substantial evidence. Claimant testified that she left her job, inter alia, because of her employer’s attitude and lack of attention toward her injury. Under the circumstances presented, the Board properly concluded that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 23, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a production worker at a manufacturing plant, injured her finger while operating heavy machinery. After having her injury bandaged at work, claimant became upset when her employer would not permit another employee to drive her to a medical clinic. Claimant drove herself to the clinic and subsequently resigned from her position. The Board denied claimants application for unemployment insurance benefits, finding that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. We find that the Board’s decision is sup[897]*897ported by substantial evidence. Claimant testified that she left her job, inter alia, because of her employer’s attitude and lack of attention toward her injury. Under the circumstances presented, the Board properly concluded that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 896, 638 N.Y.S.2d 233, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1497, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-sanders-nyappdiv-1996.