In re the Claim of Salvaggione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Salvaggione

49 A.D.2d 774, 372 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10785

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 774 (In re the Claim of Salvaggione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Salvaggione, 49 A.D.2d 774, 372 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10785 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 27, 1974, which affirmed a referee’s decision sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner that claimant was disqualified from benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The claimant admittedly left his employment for personal reasons. At the hearing he contended he had been given a leave of absence by his employer, however, [775]*775the employer’s representative at the hearing testified from personal knowledge that he would have been required to authorize such a leave and had not done so. The issue was one of credibility and the board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 27, 1974, which affirmed a referee’s decision sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner that claimant was disqualified from benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The claimant admittedly left his employment for personal reasons. At the hearing he contended he had been given a leave of absence by his employer, however, [775]*775the employer’s representative at the hearing testified from personal knowledge that he would have been required to authorize such a leave and had not done so. The issue was one of credibility and the board’s determination is supported by substantial evidence. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 774, 372 N.Y.S.2d 248, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-salvaggione-nyappdiv-1975.