In re the Claim of Saloman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Saloman

206 A.D.2d 650, 614 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7327

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 14, 1994·Published

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 9, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had insufficient weeks of covered employment.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Board solely for the purpose of determining whether there was compliance with the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [US Dist Ct, SD NY, Aug. 1, 1983, Carter, J., 79 Civ 5899]). The Board found no substantial procedural violations and therefore adhered to its prior decision finding claimant ineligible to receive benefits. Claimant fails to allege any procedural errors on this appeal and we conclude that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.

Cardona, P. J., White, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 9, 1993, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its original decision ruling that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had insufficient weeks of covered employment.

Claimant’s case was reopened by the Board solely for the purpose of determining whether there was compliance with the consent judgment in Municipal Labor Comm. v Sitkin (1983 WL 44294 [US Dist Ct, SD NY, Aug. 1, 1983, Carter, J., 79 Civ 5899]). The Board found no substantial procedural violations and therefore adhered to its prior decision finding claimant ineligible to receive benefits. Claimant fails to allege any procedural errors on this appeal and we conclude that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence.

Cardona, P. J., White, Weiss, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

In re the Claim of Saloman, 206 A.D.2d 650, 614 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 650 (In re the Claim of Saloman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.