In re the Claim of Salo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Salo

247 A.D.2d 808, 669 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1884

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 26, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 247 A.D.2d 808 (In re the Claim of Salo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Salo, 247 A.D.2d 808, 669 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 14, 1996, which ruled that Yvon Mau Wines, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.

Claimant was a salesperson for Yvon Mau Wines, Inc. [809]*809(hereinafter YMW), a wine distributor. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s conclusion that YMW exercised sufficient direction and control over the work of claimant and other persons similarly situated to establish their status as YMW’s employees and not independent contractors (see, Matter of Rivera [State Line Delivery Serv. — Roberts], 69 NY2d 679, cert denied 481 US 1049). YMW set claimant’s commission rate, established his monthly sales goal, paid claimant biweekly as a draw on his commission and continued to do so even when claimant did not earn enough commission to cover his draw. YMW also paid claimant $75 per week for business expenses and covered 50% of claimant’s monthly health insurance premium. Additionally, YMW set the price for its wines, provided claimant with sales leads and, after customer orders were placed, handled all shipping and invoicing matters. While a contrary conclusion could be reached on the record evidence, inasmuch as we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that an employer-employee relationship exists, it will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assocs. [Roberts], 60 NY2d 734, 736).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 14, 1996, which ruled that Yvon Mau Wines, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.

Claimant was a salesperson for Yvon Mau Wines, Inc. [809]*809(hereinafter YMW), a wine distributor. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s conclusion that YMW exercised sufficient direction and control over the work of claimant and other persons similarly situated to establish their status as YMW’s employees and not independent contractors (see, Matter of Rivera [State Line Delivery Serv. — Roberts], 69 NY2d 679, cert denied 481 US 1049). YMW set claimant’s commission rate, established his monthly sales goal, paid claimant biweekly as a draw on his commission and continued to do so even when claimant did not earn enough commission to cover his draw. YMW also paid claimant $75 per week for business expenses and covered 50% of claimant’s monthly health insurance premium. Additionally, YMW set the price for its wines, provided claimant with sales leads and, after customer orders were placed, handled all shipping and invoicing matters. While a contrary conclusion could be reached on the record evidence, inasmuch as we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that an employer-employee relationship exists, it will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assocs. [Roberts], 60 NY2d 734, 736).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 A.D.2d 808, 669 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-salo-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack