In re the Claim of Salo

247 A.D.2d 808, 669 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1884
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 14, 1996, which ruled that Yvon Mau Wines, Inc. was liable for unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to claimant and those similarly situated.

Claimant was a salesperson for Yvon Mau Wines, Inc. [809] (hereinafter YMW), a wine distributor. Substantial evidence supports the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s conclusion that YMW exercised sufficient direction and control over the work of claimant and other persons similarly situated to establish their status as YMW’s employees and not independent contractors (see, Matter of Rivera [State Line Delivery Serv. — Roberts], 69 NY2d 679, cert denied 481 US 1049). YMW set claimant’s commission rate, established his monthly sales goal, paid claimant biweekly as a draw on his commission and continued to do so even when claimant did not earn enough commission to cover his draw. YMW also paid claimant $75 per week for business expenses and covered 50% of claimant’s monthly health insurance premium. Additionally, YMW set the price for its wines, provided claimant with sales leads and, after customer orders were placed, handled all shipping and invoicing matters. While a contrary conclusion could be reached on the record evidence, inasmuch as we find substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that an employer-employee relationship exists, it will not be disturbed (see, Matter of Concourse Ophthalmology Assocs. [Roberts], 60 NY2d 734, 736).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Salo, 247 A.D.2d 808, 669 N.Y.S.2d 405, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

247 A.D.2d 808 (In re the Claim of Salo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Miciletto
109 A.D.3d 1035 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re the Claim of McCarthy
276 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)