In re the Claim of Rothstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Rothstein

49 A.D.2d 986, 374 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11310

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 986 (In re the Claim of Rothstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Rothstein, 49 A.D.2d 986, 374 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11310 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 10, 1974, which disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground she voluntarily left her employment to follow her spouse to another locality. Claimant’s husband moved to Florida for medical reasons and she accompa[987]*987nied him. There is no evidence in the record that claimant’s presence in Florida was needed to attend to her husband’s health needs or provide any special care for him. Under such circumstances, it is settled that she is disqualified pursuant to section 593 (subd 1, par [b]) of the Labor Law (see Matter of Daniels [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 820; Matter of Sanchez [Catherwood], 27 AD2d 678). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Sweeney, Koreman, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 10, 1974, which disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground she voluntarily left her employment to follow her spouse to another locality. Claimant’s husband moved to Florida for medical reasons and she accompa[987]*987nied him. There is no evidence in the record that claimant’s presence in Florida was needed to attend to her husband’s health needs or provide any special care for him. Under such circumstances, it is settled that she is disqualified pursuant to section 593 (subd 1, par [b]) of the Labor Law (see Matter of Daniels [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 820; Matter of Sanchez [Catherwood], 27 AD2d 678). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Sweeney, Koreman, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 986, 374 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-rothstein-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack