In re the Claim of Roth
This text of 133 A.D.3d 1024 (In re the Claim of Roth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 17, 2014, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from [1025]*1025receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Decision affirmed. No opinion.
Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
133 A.D.3d 1024, 18 N.Y.S.3d 895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-roth-nyappdiv-2015.