In re the Claim of Rosenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Rosenthal

50 A.D.2d 1024, 376 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12015

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 1024 (In re the Claim of Rosenthal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Rosenthal, 50 A.D.2d 1024, 376 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12015 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 9, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding that claimant lost his employment through misconduct in connection therewith. The claimant was a repairman working for the New York Telephone Company and on numerous occasions he had received warning that if he continued to leave the job site without authorization he would be discharged. The record sustains the finding that on March 4, 1975 the claimant was not at his work-assigned location; that he misrepresented to the dispatcher the location from which he made a telephone call and he did not properly report his next assignment. As a result thereof, he showed a complete disregard of the interests of his employer. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 9, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding that claimant lost his employment through misconduct in connection therewith. The claimant was a repairman working for the New York Telephone Company and on numerous occasions he had received warning that if he continued to leave the job site without authorization he would be discharged. The record sustains the finding that on March 4, 1975 the claimant was not at his work-assigned location; that he misrepresented to the dispatcher the location from which he made a telephone call and he did not properly report his next assignment. As a result thereof, he showed a complete disregard of the interests of his employer. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 1024, 376 N.Y.S.2d 713, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-rosenthal-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack