In re the Claim of Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Rosen

50 A.D.2d 621, 374 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12421

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 621 (In re the Claim of Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Rosen, 50 A.D.2d 621, 374 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12421 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 2, 1974, reopened and adhered to April 24, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee charging claimant with an overpayment of $1,875 in benefits ruled to be recoverable. The overpayment arises from a prior board decision filed January 25, 1974, reversing a referee’s decision allowing claimant benefits which claimant had received. Since claimant took no appeal from the prior adverse board decision, we cannot consider the contentions he now raises. The decision of the board holding the benefits paid prior to the reversal by the board of the referee’s decision to be recoverable must, therefore, be affirmed (Labor Law, § 598, subd 2). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 2, 1974, reopened and adhered to April 24, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee charging claimant with an overpayment of $1,875 in benefits ruled to be recoverable. The overpayment arises from a prior board decision filed January 25, 1974, reversing a referee’s decision allowing claimant benefits which claimant had received. Since claimant took no appeal from the prior adverse board decision, we cannot consider the contentions he now raises. The decision of the board holding the benefits paid prior to the reversal by the board of the referee’s decision to be recoverable must, therefore, be affirmed (Labor Law, § 598, subd 2). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 621, 374 N.Y.S.2d 157, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-rosen-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack