In re the Claim of Robinson

9 A.D.3d 779, 779 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9905

This text of 9 A.D.3d 779 (In re the Claim of Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Robinson, 9 A.D.3d 779, 779 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

[780]*780Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 17, 2003, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he was not totally unemployed. The record establishes that claimant operates a small business selling fragrances and. body oils. As part of his business venture, claimant maintained a business checking account, passed out business cards, sold products to clients and regularly placed orders for the products. Claimant is looking to expand the business, possibly by opening a small store, and intends to claim any net losses or gains on his personal income tax return. Although claimant testified that his business is not yet profitable, he nevertheless stood to gain financially from the continued operation of the business (see Matter of Rhode [Commissioner of Labor], 274 AD2d 725, 726 [2000]). Under these circumstances we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision that claimant’s activities constitute employment within the meaning of the Labor Law (see Matter of Standig [Commissioner of Labor], 3 AD3d 828 [2004]; Matter of Rhode [Commissioner of Labor], supra at 726).

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Standig
3 A.D.3d 828 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Rhode
274 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.D.3d 779, 779 N.Y.S.2d 869, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-robinson-nyappdiv-2004.