In re the Claim of Risdell

52 A.D.2d 1025, 383 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12927
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 27, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 1025 (In re the Claim of Risdell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Risdell, 52 A.D.2d 1025, 383 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 28, 1975, which adopted and affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she lost her employment through misconduct. The board found: "Clearly, claimant used bad judgment when she changed the listing of her own telephone number without prior approval by a supervisor. Likewise, it is clear that the employer did not suffer as a result of claimant’s act. Nevertheless, the employer, a large public utility with vast public responsibility, must make reasonable work rules in order to properly operate. It is significant that at the time claimant violated the employer’s rules, she knew of the rule and knew that she violated it. By changing the directory listing from her own name to that of a fictitious person, the type of service claimant was enjoying as a concession from the employer was no longer accurately reflected on the company’s records as required by the employer’s regulations. Claimant’s course of conduct was misconduct within the meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Law.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the board’s finding. The claimant introduced at the hearing considerable testimony as to collateral issues, apparently not considered by the board and certainly not germane to its decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Chen
188 A.D.2d 812 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
In re the Claim of Fisher
138 A.D.2d 912 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 A.D.2d 1025, 383 N.Y.S.2d 692, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-risdell-nyappdiv-1976.