In re the Claim of Raymond A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Raymond A.

78 A.D.2d 563, 431 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12924

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 1980

StatusPublished

This text of 78 A.D.2d 563 (In re the Claim of Raymond A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Raymond A., 78 A.D.2d 563, 431 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 25, 1979, which modified a decision of the Administrative Law Judge disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because of misconduct, and found the claimant disqualified because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The original notice to claimant indicated a hearing was to be held to determine whether claimant lost his employment because of misconduct. The ultimate determination found claimant lost his employment because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, claimant was deprived of the opportunity to prepare a defense because of lack of adequate notice of the purpose of the hearing (Matter of Lynch [Ross], 67 AD2d 1046). Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 25, 1979, which modified a decision of the Administrative Law Judge disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because of misconduct, and found the claimant disqualified because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The original notice to claimant indicated a hearing was to be held to determine whether claimant lost his employment because of misconduct. The ultimate determination found claimant lost his employment because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, claimant was deprived of the opportunity to prepare a defense because of lack of adequate notice of the purpose of the hearing (Matter of Lynch [Ross], 67 AD2d 1046). Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 A.D.2d 563, 431 N.Y.S.2d 729, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-raymond-a-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack