In re the Claim of Pruzansky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Pruzansky

50 A.D.2d 640, 375 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12458

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 640 (In re the Claim of Pruzansky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Pruzansky, 50 A.D.2d 640, 375 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12458 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board filed January 22, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant for refusing employment for which she was reasonably fitted. Claimant, a legal secretary, was disqualified from eligibility for benefits because she refused employment as a secretary for two associates of a law firm at the prevailing wage. The finding by the board that her refusal to accept employment was without good cause was supported by substantial evidence in the record (Matter of Green [Republic Steel Corp. — Levine], 44 AD2d 345). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board filed January 22, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant for refusing employment for which she was reasonably fitted. Claimant, a legal secretary, was disqualified from eligibility for benefits because she refused employment as a secretary for two associates of a law firm at the prevailing wage. The finding by the board that her refusal to accept employment was without good cause was supported by substantial evidence in the record (Matter of Green [Republic Steel Corp. — Levine], 44 AD2d 345). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 640, 375 N.Y.S.2d 55, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-pruzansky-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack