In re the Claim of Powers

227 A.D.2d 788, 642 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4977
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 9, 1996
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 227 A.D.2d 788 (In re the Claim of Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Powers, 227 A.D.2d 788, 642 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 7, 1995, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant left her job as a sales clerk at a retail store to move to Connecticut where she found lower-cost housing. After a hearing, the Board denied her application for unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals, arguing, inter alia, that she left her job out of financial necessity and due to her and her husband’s health. Although claimant testified that she could not afford a $50 per month increase in rent imposed in February 1992, she stated that she quit her job in March 1992 but did not move to Connecticut until May 1992. In addition, she admitted that there was a surplus of funds left over after deducting her monthly expenses, including the increase in rent, from her and her husband’s monthly earnings. Moreover, claimant failed to provide a detailed account of her efforts to find suitable, alternative living arrangements near her place of employment. In view of the foregoing, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant left her job for personal and noncompelling reasons. We have considered claimant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

[789]*789Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Johnson
295 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
In re the Claim of Mashnouk
247 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Dampman
246 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Petruzzi
244 A.D.2d 754 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re the Claim of Work
238 A.D.2d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D.2d 788, 642 N.Y.S.2d 383, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-powers-nyappdiv-1996.