In re the Claim of Ponce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Ponce

209 A.D.2d 756, 618 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10851

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 3, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 209 A.D.2d 756 (In re the Claim of Ponce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Ponce, 209 A.D.2d 756, 618 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 30, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant’s actions constituted misconduct thereby disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Claimant informed her employer that she had to attend to an emergency and was therefore unable to work. She never informed her employer as to the nature of this emergency nor did she indicate when she would return. Although claimant was informed that her failure to contact the employer by a certain date would result in her termination, she made no effort to contact the employer.

[757]*757Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 30, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Board’s conclusion that claimant’s actions constituted misconduct thereby disqualifying her from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. Claimant informed her employer that she had to attend to an emergency and was therefore unable to work. She never informed her employer as to the nature of this emergency nor did she indicate when she would return. Although claimant was informed that her failure to contact the employer by a certain date would result in her termination, she made no effort to contact the employer.

[757]*757Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

209 A.D.2d 756, 618 N.Y.S.2d 589, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-ponce-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack