In re the Claim of Pineau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Pineau

24 A.D.2d 782, 263 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3210

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 782 (In re the Claim of Pineau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Pineau, 24 A.D.2d 782, 263 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the CIourt.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which ruled him ineligible to receive benefits for the period “January 8 through January 14, 1662” finding that he had failed to comply with registration requirements. (Labor Law, § 590, subd. 1; § 596, subds. 1, 2; 32 NYCRR 473J. [a],) Claimant’s failure of compliance is not disputed. The record discloses no basis upon which we would be justified in disturbing the board’s refusal to excuse the omission and to grant permission to predate the daim. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the CIourt.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which ruled him ineligible to receive benefits for the period “January 8 through January 14, 1662” finding that he had failed to comply with registration requirements. (Labor Law, § 590, subd. 1; § 596, subds. 1, 2; 32 NYCRR 473J. [a],) Claimant’s failure of compliance is not disputed. The record discloses no basis upon which we would be justified in disturbing the board’s refusal to excuse the omission and to grant permission to predate the daim. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Taylor and Hamm, JJ,, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 782, 263 N.Y.S.2d 594, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-pineau-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack