In re the Claim of Pierro

280 A.D.2d 750, 721 N.Y.S.2d 119, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 976
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 1, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 280 A.D.2d 750 (In re the Claim of Pierro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Pierro, 280 A.D.2d 750, 721 N.Y.S.2d 119, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 14, 1999, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant challenges a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she was terminated from her employment as a receptionist due to misconduct. The record establishes that claimant left her desk at 4:15 p.m., notwithstanding her supervisor’s instructions to wait until 4:25 p.m. in order to receive additional outgoing mail from the company president. Insubordination and failure to abide by a reasonable request of the employer have been held to constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Soto [Commissioner of Labor], 262 AD2d 693; Matter of Barry [Hu[751]*751dacs], 199 AD2d 807). Inasmuch as claimant disregarded the supervisor’s instructions and left work early, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Board that claimant engaged in disqualifying misconduct.

Crew III, J. P., Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Lyczek
285 A.D.2d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Claim of Survilla
283 A.D.2d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
280 A.D.2d 750, 721 N.Y.S.2d 119, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-pierro-nyappdiv-2001.