In re the Claim of Pierre

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Pierre

50 A.D.2d 637, 375 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12450

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 637 (In re the Claim of Pierre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Pierre, 50 A.D.2d 637, 375 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12450 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 5, 1975, which disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The board found that claimant, a shipping clerk supervisor, resigned his employment because he failed to receive a raise which he had been seeking for two years. It further found that claimant had never been promised a. raise, nor did he have a firm job prospect when he left his employment. An examination of the record establishes that there is substantial evidence to sustain the board’s determination that claimant left his employment without good cause. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 5, 1975, which disqualified claimant from receiving benefits on the ground he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The board found that claimant, a shipping clerk supervisor, resigned his employment because he failed to receive a raise which he had been seeking for two years. It further found that claimant had never been promised a. raise, nor did he have a firm job prospect when he left his employment. An examination of the record establishes that there is substantial evidence to sustain the board’s determination that claimant left his employment without good cause. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 637, 375 N.Y.S.2d 52, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-pierre-nyappdiv-1975.