In re the Claim of Petito

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Petito

231 A.D.2d 796, 647 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9195

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 12, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 231 A.D.2d 796 (In re the Claim of Petito) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Petito, 231 A.D.2d 796, 647 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 28, 1995, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The Board further charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of $4,158 in benefits [797]*797and reduced his right to receive future benefits because he made willful false statements to obtain benefits. Based upon our review of the record, we find that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. The employer’s witnesses testified that claimant said he was leaving his position as a cook to find a job in the real estate field. Claimant stated that he was discharged for lack of work. Since credibility determinations are matters for the Board to decide (see, Matter of Hibbard [Sweeney], 227 AD2d 698), the Board could choose to credit the testimony of the employer’s witnesses over that of claimant. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 28, 1995, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The Board disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The Board further charged claimant with a recoverable overpayment of $4,158 in benefits [797]*797and reduced his right to receive future benefits because he made willful false statements to obtain benefits. Based upon our review of the record, we find that the Board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. The employer’s witnesses testified that claimant said he was leaving his position as a cook to find a job in the real estate field. Claimant stated that he was discharged for lack of work. Since credibility determinations are matters for the Board to decide (see, Matter of Hibbard [Sweeney], 227 AD2d 698), the Board could choose to credit the testimony of the employer’s witnesses over that of claimant. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 A.D.2d 796, 647 N.Y.S.2d 126, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-petito-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack