In re the Claim of Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Perry

222 A.D.2d 924, 635 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 222 A.D.2d 924 (In re the Claim of Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Perry, 222 A.D.2d 924, 635 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 12, 1994, which, upon reconsideration, rescinded its prior decisions and ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as a production worker as the result of a fight she had with a co-worker. Her application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied because she was terminated for misconduct. Claimant argues, inter alia, that she did not initiate the fight and that, therefore, this determination is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. Regardless of who initiated the fight, there is no dispute that it occurred during working hours and that claimant was a participant. In view of this, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was terminated for misconduct. We have considered claimant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr., and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 12, 1994, which, upon reconsideration, rescinded its prior decisions and ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from her employment as a production worker as the result of a fight she had with a co-worker. Her application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied because she was terminated for misconduct. Claimant argues, inter alia, that she did not initiate the fight and that, therefore, this determination is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. Regardless of who initiated the fight, there is no dispute that it occurred during working hours and that claimant was a participant. In view of this, substantial evidence supports the Board’s finding that claimant was terminated for misconduct. We have considered claimant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr., and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 924, 635 N.Y.S.2d 364, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-perry-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack