In re the Claim of Pennington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Pennington

33 A.D.2d 946, 306 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5681

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 22, 1970

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 A.D.2d 946 (In re the Claim of Pennington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Pennington, 33 A.D.2d 946, 306 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5681 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 24, 1968, which determined that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits effective December 27, 1967 on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant, a junior engineer aboard the S. S. Junior, elected to leave the ship at Seattle, Washington on December 26, 1967 rather than sign on for the return voyage. He stated that he left the ship because he wanted to secure a better job; that he expected to be “bumped” or laid off because of lack of seniority, and that he felt he was unqualified for the job % reason of criticism by his superior. He admitted that he was offered an opportunity to sign up for the return voyage. The Referee found that “ claimant elected to leave rather than to continue aboard for various personal and non-compelling reasons best known and understood to himself ”, and the board adopted this finding. Substantial evidence supports this determination, and it may not be disturbed by this court. (Matter of Asara [Gather-wood], 32 A D 2d 699.) The various reasons advanced by claimant do not constitute good cause for leaving his employment. (Matter of La Greca [Gather-wood], 30 A D 2d 597; Matter of Schwalbe [Catherwood], 30 A D 2d 995; Matter of Haynes [Catherwood], 30 A D 2d 722; Matter of Gilmore [Gather-wood], 25 A D 2d 462.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 24, 1968, which determined that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits effective December 27, 1967 on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant, a junior engineer aboard the S. S. Junior, elected to leave the ship at Seattle, Washington on December 26, 1967 rather than sign on for the return voyage. He stated that he left the ship because he wanted to secure a better job; that he expected to be “bumped” or laid off because of lack of seniority, and that he felt he was unqualified for the job % reason of criticism by his superior. He admitted that he was offered an opportunity to sign up for the return voyage. The Referee found that “ claimant elected to leave rather than to continue aboard for various personal and non-compelling reasons best known and understood to himself ”, and the board adopted this finding. Substantial evidence supports this determination, and it may not be disturbed by this court. (Matter of Asara [Gather-wood], 32 A D 2d 699.) The various reasons advanced by claimant do not constitute good cause for leaving his employment. (Matter of La Greca [Gather-wood], 30 A D 2d 597; Matter of Schwalbe [Catherwood], 30 A D 2d 995; Matter of Haynes [Catherwood], 30 A D 2d 722; Matter of Gilmore [Gather-wood], 25 A D 2d 462.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 946, 306 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-pennington-nyappdiv-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack