In re the Claim of Pasacbeta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Pasacbeta

50 A.D.2d 1026, 377 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12019

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 1026 (In re the Claim of Pasacbeta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Pasacbeta, 50 A.D.2d 1026, 377 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12019 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 27, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant, a security guard, worked for the Burns Security Agency, and was assigned in such capacity to the American Can Company. The claimant testified that without consulting the Burns Security Agency he spoke to the client’s security chief about obtaining a raise and having weekends off. As a result of conversations with the said security chief, the claimant advised his employer that he did not feel welcome at his present assignment; that he would not continue working there and requested a new assignment. When no such assignment was available, the claimant quit his job working at the American Can Company and the board found that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The record contains substantial evidence to sustain such finding. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 27, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant, a security guard, worked for the Burns Security Agency, and was assigned in such capacity to the American Can Company. The claimant testified that without consulting the Burns Security Agency he spoke to the client’s security chief about obtaining a raise and having weekends off. As a result of conversations with the said security chief, the claimant advised his employer that he did not feel welcome at his present assignment; that he would not continue working there and requested a new assignment. When no such assignment was available, the claimant quit his job working at the American Can Company and the board found that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. The record contains substantial evidence to sustain such finding. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 1026, 377 N.Y.S.2d 289, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-pasacbeta-nyappdiv-1975.