In re the Claim of Pardoll

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Pardoll

52 A.D.2d 966, 382 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12837

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 966 (In re the Claim of Pardoll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Pardoll, 52 A.D.2d 966, 382 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 29, 1975, which reversed the decision of a referee insofar as it was appealed from and sustained an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective August 10, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. On appeal to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board claimant did not dispute the finding that he made a willful misrepresentation to obtain benefits. In most instances, the issue of credible evidence is one of fact to be determined by the board and we find as to this claimant that there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 29, 1975, which reversed the decision of a referee insofar as it was appealed from and sustained an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective August 10, 1974 because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. On appeal to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board claimant did not dispute the finding that he made a willful misrepresentation to obtain benefits. In most instances, the issue of credible evidence is one of fact to be determined by the board and we find as to this claimant that there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Mahoney, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 966, 382 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-pardoll-nyappdiv-1976.