In re the Claim of Papagni

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Papagni

219 A.D.2d 745, 631 N.Y.S.2d 93, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9168

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 7, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 219 A.D.2d 745 (In re the Claim of Papagni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Papagni, 219 A.D.2d 745, 631 N.Y.S.2d 93, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9168 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 28, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The evidence in the record is undisputed that claimant, an insurance claims examiner, resigned from his position as a result of his employer’s failure to hire additional examiners to lighten claimant’s work load. We find that this constitutes [746]*746substantial evidence supporting the Board’s decision that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 28, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

The evidence in the record is undisputed that claimant, an insurance claims examiner, resigned from his position as a result of his employer’s failure to hire additional examiners to lighten claimant’s work load. We find that this constitutes [746]*746substantial evidence supporting the Board’s decision that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D.2d 745, 631 N.Y.S.2d 93, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-papagni-nyappdiv-1995.