In re the Claim of Pampanelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Pampanelli

268 A.D.2d 668, 701 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 268 A.D.2d 668 (In re the Claim of Pampanelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Pampanelli, 268 A.D.2d 668, 701 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 15, 1998, which reduced claimant’s weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant’s benefit rate from $300 to $27 per week. The record establishes, inter alla, that claimant’s pension was wholly funded by the employer. Although claimant opted to receive her pension in a lump sum which she then reinvested, the pro-rated weekly amount of [669]*669such payment was $273, $27 less than the maximum weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate of $300 (see, Labor Law § 600 [7] [b]). Accordingly, claimant’s unemployment insurance benefits were properly reduced to $27 per week based on the amount of her pension benefits (see, Matter of Chriscaden [Sweeney], 232 AD2d 803; see also, Matter of Scheiner [Commissioner of Labor], 263 AD2d 658).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 15, 1998, which reduced claimant’s weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board reducing claimant’s benefit rate from $300 to $27 per week. The record establishes, inter alla, that claimant’s pension was wholly funded by the employer. Although claimant opted to receive her pension in a lump sum which she then reinvested, the pro-rated weekly amount of [669]*669such payment was $273, $27 less than the maximum weekly unemployment insurance benefit rate of $300 (see, Labor Law § 600 [7] [b]). Accordingly, claimant’s unemployment insurance benefits were properly reduced to $27 per week based on the amount of her pension benefits (see, Matter of Chriscaden [Sweeney], 232 AD2d 803; see also, Matter of Scheiner [Commissioner of Labor], 263 AD2d 658).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D.2d 668, 701 N.Y.S.2d 455, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-pampanelli-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack