In re the Claim of Palko

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Palko

29 A.D.2d 600, 285 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2738

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 18, 1967

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 600 (In re the Claim of Palko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Palko, 29 A.D.2d 600, 285 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board chose to reject claimant’s testimony that when she complained of the conditions, principally with respect to drafts and temperature, under which she worked, the employer discharged her. The board affirmatively found that the working conditions were not unfavorable and that after a number of previous difficulties and differences the employer told claimant on a particular day that if she left for the day, as she threatened to do, her services would be terminated, and that when she left nevertheless, her dismissal followed. Claimant had other difficulties with the employer and although her own union found no basis for her various complaints, the employer seems to have treated her with kindness and forbearance. In any event, the factual issues, including questions of credibility, were for determination by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and this record demonstrates no basis upon which we could interfere with its decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board chose to reject claimant’s testimony that when she complained of the conditions, principally with respect to drafts and temperature, under which she worked, the employer discharged her. The board affirmatively found that the working conditions were not unfavorable and that after a number of previous difficulties and differences the employer told claimant on a particular day that if she left for the day, as she threatened to do, her services would be terminated, and that when she left nevertheless, her dismissal followed. Claimant had other difficulties with the employer and although her own union found no basis for her various complaints, the employer seems to have treated her with kindness and forbearance. In any event, the factual issues, including questions of credibility, were for determination by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board and this record demonstrates no basis upon which we could interfere with its decision. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum Per Curiam.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 600, 285 N.Y.S.2d 345, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-palko-nyappdiv-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack