In re the Claim of Paladino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Paladino

202 A.D.2d 838, 609 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2540

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 202 A.D.2d 838 (In re the Claim of Paladino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Paladino, 202 A.D.2d 838, 609 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2540 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 10, 1992, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits by the New Jersey Unemployment Insurance Board of Review on the basis of its determination that claimant had voluntarily left his employment as a laborer without good cause. In that claimant was afforded his due process rights in the New Jersey proceedings, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board correctly found that it was bound by this determination. Moreover, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant failed to comply with the registration requirements for filing a timely claim in New York and is, therefore, ineligible to receive benefits.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 10, 1992, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

Claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits by the New Jersey Unemployment Insurance Board of Review on the basis of its determination that claimant had voluntarily left his employment as a laborer without good cause. In that claimant was afforded his due process rights in the New Jersey proceedings, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board correctly found that it was bound by this determination. Moreover, there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant failed to comply with the registration requirements for filing a timely claim in New York and is, therefore, ineligible to receive benefits.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 A.D.2d 838, 609 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-paladino-nyappdiv-1994.