In re the Claim of Palacios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Palacios

210 A.D.2d 715, 620 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12694

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 715 (In re the Claim of Palacios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Palacios, 210 A.D.2d 715, 620 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 29, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a material handler for the employer. Claimant made lewd and suggestive remarks to a [716]*716female co-worker. The employer discharged claimant. Review of the record supports the Board’s finding that such harassment occurred and that it constituted misconduct. We therefore affirm.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 29, 1993, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a material handler for the employer. Claimant made lewd and suggestive remarks to a [716]*716female co-worker. The employer discharged claimant. Review of the record supports the Board’s finding that such harassment occurred and that it constituted misconduct. We therefore affirm.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 715, 620 N.Y.S.2d 173, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-palacios-nyappdiv-1994.