In re the Claim of Paine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Paine

272 A.D.2d 1094

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1094 (In re the Claim of Paine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Paine, 272 A.D.2d 1094 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by an employer from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which affirmed the decision of a referee holding claimant to be entitled to unemployment insurance benefits based upon her earnings received from the appellant partnership. Claimant was employed as a switchboard operator at the Professional and Business Telephone Exchange at Utica, New York, from October 17, 1937, to October 17, 1945. The board found that the ' employer herein was a partnership consisting of Janet Friedman, Lois Friedman and Bertram Friedman. The board also found that Louis Friedman was an employee of the partnership. The evidence sustains the findings. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by an employer from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which affirmed the decision of a referee holding claimant to be entitled to unemployment insurance benefits based upon her earnings received from the appellant partnership. Claimant was employed as a switchboard operator at the Professional and Business Telephone Exchange at Utica, New York, from October 17, 1937, to October 17, 1945. The board found that the ' employer herein was a partnership consisting of Janet Friedman, Lois Friedman and Bertram Friedman. The board also found that Louis Friedman was an employee of the partnership. The evidence sustains the findings. Decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirmed, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1094, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-paine-nyappdiv-1947.