In re the Claim of Paccione

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Paccione

213 A.D.2d 931, 624 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3024

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 213 A.D.2d 931 (In re the Claim of Paccione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Paccione, 213 A.D.2d 931, 624 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3024 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 24, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a sales associate without good cause. The record reveals that although claimant failed to communicate her concerns to her employer, claimant resigned from her position because she was dissatisfied with numerous aspects of her employment. In view of this, the Board’s finding that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons must be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 24, 1994, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Upon review of the record, we find that there is substantial evidence to support the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a sales associate without good cause. The record reveals that although claimant failed to communicate her concerns to her employer, claimant resigned from her position because she was dissatisfied with numerous aspects of her employment. In view of this, the Board’s finding that claimant left her employment for personal and noncompelling reasons must be upheld.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 A.D.2d 931, 624 N.Y.S.2d 971, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-paccione-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack