In re the Claim of Overton v. Rochambeau School

58 A.D.2d 694, 396 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12798
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1977·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed July 7, 1975. Claimant was a student trainee in the Manpower Development Program of the New York State Department of Labor learning to operate a milling machine under instruction provided by employees of the Rochambeau School. While on school premises in the course of his training, he sustained an injury to his left index finger resulting in its partial amputation. The board has denied claimant benefits holding he was a student and not an employee at the school. Although the record contains proof that claimant received a weekly check in the amount of $71, it is clear that this sum was merely a training allowance paid by the Unemployment Insurance Division of the New York State Department of Labor. There is no evidence that he produced anything for or was employed by the Rochambeau School. Accordingly, since the determination is one of fact which is supported by substantial evidence, the decision of the board must be affirmed (Matter of Worth v Hubbell Lbr. Corp., 29 AD2d 1025). Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Overton v. Rochambeau School, 58 A.D.2d 694, 396 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

58 A.D.2d 694 (In re the Claim of Overton v. Rochambeau School) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walls v. North Mississippi Med. Center
568 So. 2d 712 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1990)
Tommy Nobis Center v. Barfield
370 S.E.2d 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)