Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re the Claim of Ouwerkerk

In re the Claim of Ouwerkerk

101 A.D.2d 925, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18654
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 14, 1984·Published

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal as untimely taken, pursuant to section 624 of the Labor Law, denied, without costs (see Matter of Gonzalez [Ross], 47 NY2d 922; Matter ofKrasniqi [Simnica — Ross], 87 AD2d 923). Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Ouwerkerk, 101 A.D.2d 925, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

101 A.D.2d 925 (In re the Claim of Ouwerkerk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Claim of Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 482 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
In re the Claim of Krasniqi
87 A.D.2d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)