In re the Claim of O'Hara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of O'Hara

50 A.D.2d 955, 376 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11899

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 955 (In re the Claim of O'Hara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of O'Hara, 50 A.D.2d 955, 376 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11899 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective October 12, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board found that the credible evidence established that there was not sufficient change in the condition of the claimant’s employment to justify her resignation and that, therefore, she separated from her employment without good cause. There is substantial evidence in the record to sustain such finding. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 3, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective October 12, 1974 because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board found that the credible evidence established that there was not sufficient change in the condition of the claimant’s employment to justify her resignation and that, therefore, she separated from her employment without good cause. There is substantial evidence in the record to sustain such finding. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Koreman and Larkin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 955, 376 N.Y.S.2d 410, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-ohara-nyappdiv-1975.