In re the Claim of Odoi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Odoi

199 A.D.2d 795, 608 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 199 A.D.2d 795 (In re the Claim of Odoi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Odoi, 199 A.D.2d 795, 608 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 5, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant was discharged for misconduct because he failed to follow the explicit directions of his employer. Further, we find no evidence in the record to support claimant’s assertion that he was denied due process or otherwise deprived of a fair and impartial hearing.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 5, 1992, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

The record contains substantial evidence to support the Board’s determination that claimant was discharged for misconduct because he failed to follow the explicit directions of his employer. Further, we find no evidence in the record to support claimant’s assertion that he was denied due process or otherwise deprived of a fair and impartial hearing.

Mikoll, J. P., Yesawich Jr., Mercure, Crew III and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 795, 608 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-odoi-nyappdiv-1993.