In re the Claim of Nowicki

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Nowicki

263 A.D. 758, 30 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4839

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 12, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 758 (In re the Claim of Nowicki) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Nowicki, 263 A.D. 758, 30 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal by the Electrolux Corporation from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirming the decision of a referee holding that the claimant was an employee of the appellant within the meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Law. The question in this case is whether the claimant was an employee or an independent contractor. There is no question but that the claimant was an independent contractor and that the decision appealed from should be reversed , and the proceeding dismissed, with costs to the appellant against the Industrial Commissioner, upon the authority of Matter of Electrolux Corporation [262 App. Div. 642], Decision reversed and proceeding dismissed, with costs to appellant against the Industrial Commissioner, on the authority of Matter of Electrolux Corporation (supra), decided herewith. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Seheneck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an appeal by the Electrolux Corporation from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board affirming the decision of a referee holding that the claimant was an employee of the appellant within the meaning of the Unemployment Insurance Law. The question in this case is whether the claimant was an employee or an independent contractor. There is no question but that the claimant was an independent contractor and that the decision appealed from should be reversed , and the proceeding dismissed, with costs to the appellant against the Industrial Commissioner, upon the authority of Matter of Electrolux Corporation [262 App. Div. 642], Decision reversed and proceeding dismissed, with costs to appellant against the Industrial Commissioner, on the authority of Matter of Electrolux Corporation (supra), decided herewith. Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Seheneck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 758, 30 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-nowicki-nyappdiv-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack