In re the Claim of Naraine

245 A.D.2d 932, 666 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13589
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1997·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 24, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was employed as a customer service representative for a retail store until she was terminated for violating the employer’s cash-handling procedure. Claimant acknowledged that she had received a copy of the employer’s cash-handling policy and procedure, which stated that an employee’s failure [933] to comply therewith would result in disciplinary action, including termination. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant lost her job under disqualifying circumstances. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. Failure to comply with an employer’s established policies or procedures has been held to constitute disqualifying misconduct (see, Matter of Rothman [Sweeney], 242 AD2d 818; Matter of O’Shea [Sweeney], 233 AD2d 736). Claimant’s exculpatory explanation for the incident which caused her discharge raised a credibility issue which the Board was free to resolve against her (see, Matter of Perkov [Sweeney], 231 AD2d 780; Matter of Johnson [Ross], 81 AD2d 681, 682).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Yesawich Jr., Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Claim of Naraine, 245 A.D.2d 932, 666 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13589 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 932 (In re the Claim of Naraine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Claim of Davila
13 A.D.3d 1043 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Larsen
288 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Claim of Cordova
277 A.D.2d 623 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Gewirtz
276 A.D.2d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Claim of Ahmed
254 A.D.2d 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Oliver
253 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Gibson
250 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
In re the Claim of Hendrickson
250 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)