In re the Claim of Nachman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Nachman

51 A.D.2d 1101, 381 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11963

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1101 (In re the Claim of Nachman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Nachman, 51 A.D.2d 1101, 381 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11963 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective February 1, 1975 because she voluntarily left her employment to follow her spouse to another locality. Claimant left her job in New York where she had been employed for 14 years to relocate in Florida with her husband. Claimant’s husband’s doctor advised him to go to a warmer climate. The testimony and evidence, however, clearly establish that claimant’s personal presence was not needed in Florida to care for her husband. Accordingly, she is disqualified under the statute (Labor Law, § 593, subd 1, par [b], cl [2]; Matter of Sanchez [Catherwood] 27 AD2d 678). Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 29, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective February 1, 1975 because she voluntarily left her employment to follow her spouse to another locality. Claimant left her job in New York where she had been employed for 14 years to relocate in Florida with her husband. Claimant’s husband’s doctor advised him to go to a warmer climate. The testimony and evidence, however, clearly establish that claimant’s personal presence was not needed in Florida to care for her husband. Accordingly, she is disqualified under the statute (Labor Law, § 593, subd 1, par [b], cl [2]; Matter of Sanchez [Catherwood] 27 AD2d 678). Decision affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 1101, 381 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-nachman-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack