In re the Claim of Muslo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Muslo

50 A.D.2d 974, 376 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11934

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 11, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 A.D.2d 974 (In re the Claim of Muslo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Muslo, 50 A.D.2d 974, 376 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 18, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits effective October 15, 1974 on the ground that he lost his employment because of misconduct. Claimant, employed by a taxicab company to grease [975]*975and maintain its taxicabs, was discharged on the ground that he neglected to perform a portion of his work and performed other duties improperly. While claimant denies these charges, the board was confronted with questions of credibility which it could properly resolve against the claimant. Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the factual findings of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 18, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying the claimant from receiving benefits effective October 15, 1974 on the ground that he lost his employment because of misconduct. Claimant, employed by a taxicab company to grease [975]*975and maintain its taxicabs, was discharged on the ground that he neglected to perform a portion of his work and performed other duties improperly. While claimant denies these charges, the board was confronted with questions of credibility which it could properly resolve against the claimant. Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the factual findings of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Kane, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 974, 376 N.Y.S.2d 234, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-muslo-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack