In re the Claim of Moscarello

64 A.D.2d 779, 407 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12625

This text of 64 A.D.2d 779 (In re the Claim of Moscarello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Moscarello, 64 A.D.2d 779, 407 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 8, 1977, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner denying claimant benefits on the ground he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant was employed as a picture framer in a retail store. A customer became abusive to him and claimant responded in kind. His employer advised him that as a result of this conduct he would be fired at the end of the day. Claimant left that afternoon, and the appeal board has sustained a finding that he was guilty of misconduct and left his employment in anticipation of being fired. Nevertheless, it upheld the initial determination that he voluntarily resigned and was not entitled to benefits. From this record it is clear that claimant was actually fired and that leaving a few hours early on the date of such termination does not come within the rule of voluntarily leaving in anticipation of discharge as set forth in Matter of Mastro (Levine) (52 AD2d 708). Although claimant’s testimony at the hearing lends some support for a conclusion that misconduct may have been the basis for his separation, his initial disqualification was not founded on that ground and no employer representative appeared at the hearing. Accordingly, claimant had neither reason nor opportunity to respond to such an allegation and the issue merits further consideration. Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Greenblott, J. P., Kane, Staley, Jr., Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Claim of Mastro
52 A.D.2d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A.D.2d 779, 407 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-moscarello-nyappdiv-1978.