In Re the Claim of Morton
31 N.E.2d 205, 284 N.Y. 738, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1348
Opinion
Motion to amend remittitur denied, without costs. The respondent expressly withdrew the question which by amendment to the remittitur it now asks the court to decide. This court has not passed upon that question and it may be argued in the court below. (See 284 N. Y. 167.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re the Claim of Morton, 31 N.E.2d 205, 284 N.Y. 738, 1940 N.Y. LEXIS 1348 (N.Y. 1940).
31 N.E.2d 205 (In Re the Claim of Morton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lopez v. Uber Tech., Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 30798(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2025)
Spirella Co. v. Miller
261 A.D. 745 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In re Claim for Benefits under Article 18 of the Labor Law, Made by Morton
261 A.D. 406 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1941)
In Re the Claim of Morton
30 N.E.2d 369 (New York Court of Appeals, 1940)