In re the Claim of Morbelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Morbelli

26 A.D.2d 886, 274 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3223

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 27, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 A.D.2d 886 (In re the Claim of Morbelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Morbelli, 26 A.D.2d 886, 274 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3223 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board holding that claimant was not eligible for benefits because she was not available for work beginning September 13, 1965 through October 3, 1965 within the meaning of the statute. (Unemployment Insurance Law [Labor Law, art. 18] § 591, subd. 2.) Claimant, a sewing-machine operator on dresses, filed for benefits on September 13, 1965. She had been ill during the Summer and, on that day, was able to resume work. She was advised by her regular employer that he had no work. On making application for benefits, she was advised to look for work. The board determined that claimant was not making a serious effort to obtain employment, but was awaiting recall by her last employer. “ Availability for employment is a question of fact to be determined by the Referee and the Appeal Board and such determination must be upheld if there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding ”. (Matter of Lauro [Catherwood], 14 A D 2d 604; Matter of Petrossi [Catherwood], 24 A D 2d 782.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Taylor, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board holding that claimant was not eligible for benefits because she was not available for work beginning September 13, 1965 through October 3, 1965 within the meaning of the statute. (Unemployment Insurance Law [Labor Law, art. 18] § 591, subd. 2.) Claimant, a sewing-machine operator on dresses, filed for benefits on September 13, 1965. She had been ill during the Summer and, on that day, was able to resume work. She was advised by her regular employer that he had no work. On making application for benefits, she was advised to look for work. The board determined that claimant was not making a serious effort to obtain employment, but was awaiting recall by her last employer. “ Availability for employment is a question of fact to be determined by the Referee and the Appeal Board and such determination must be upheld if there is substantial evidence to sustain the finding ”. (Matter of Lauro [Catherwood], 14 A D 2d 604; Matter of Petrossi [Catherwood], 24 A D 2d 782.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ., concur; Taylor, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 886, 274 N.Y.S.2d 389, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-morbelli-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack