In re the Claim of Moorehead

24 A.D.2d 663, 261 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3654
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 8, 1965
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 663 (In re the Claim of Moorehead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Claim of Moorehead, 24 A.D.2d 663, 261 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Opinion

Hamm, J.

[664]*664Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which held him ineligible for benefits for the period “ August 1 through September 6, 1964,” finding that he filed for benefits effective September 8, 1964, and thus failed to comply with reporting and registration requirements (Labor Law, § 590, subd. 1; § 596). The claimant, as he testified, was not misled by anyone but failed to file because he “ was not going to ask the State for any help at all ” because he “ thought in a week or two [he] would §iit work.” When his efforts to obtain employment were, contrary to his expectation, exhausted without success, he filed his claim. The board’s findings, being supported by substantial evidence, all of it, in fact, submitted by the claimant, must be affirmed. The record discloses no basis upon which we could disturb the denial of the claimant’s application to predate the claim. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
513 A.2d 235 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.2d 663, 261 N.Y.S.2d 235, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-moorehead-nyappdiv-1965.