In re the Claim of Monreale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Monreale

249 A.D.2d 620, 670 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3590

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 620 (In re the Claim of Monreale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Monreale, 249 A.D.2d 620, 670 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 22, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her position as a commercial property underwriter for an insurance company because she was unable to secure affordable child care after her mother-in-law informed claimant that she was no longer available to babysit. The record establishes that claimant neither requested a leave of absence nor expended sufficient effort in searching for acceptable child care (see, Matter of Romano [Sweeney], 239 AD2d 690; see also, Matter of Ducat [Sweeney], 231 AD2d 796). We conclude that the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause, is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Romano [Sweeney], supra).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 22, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant resigned from her position as a commercial property underwriter for an insurance company because she was unable to secure affordable child care after her mother-in-law informed claimant that she was no longer available to babysit. The record establishes that claimant neither requested a leave of absence nor expended sufficient effort in searching for acceptable child care (see, Matter of Romano [Sweeney], 239 AD2d 690; see also, Matter of Ducat [Sweeney], 231 AD2d 796). We conclude that the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, finding that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause, is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Romano [Sweeney], supra).

Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs. .

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 620, 670 N.Y.S.2d 938, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-monreale-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack