In re the Claim of Monohan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Monohan

217 A.D.2d 778, 629 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7753

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 13, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 217 A.D.2d 778 (In re the Claim of Monohan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Monohan, 217 A.D.2d 778, 629 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7753 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 26,1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Claimant, who worked as an operations manager for an employment placement service for four years, earned a yearly salary of $25,000 plus a few thousand dollars in commissions prior to losing her employment. She was subsequently offered a position as a sales representative for a health insurance company which paid a salary of $25,000 per year and included the use of a car and other benefits. Claimant refused the position due to the employer’s failure to accede to her request for a salary of $27,000 per year. In view of these facts, which are undisputed by the parties, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that petitioner refused suitable employment without good cause.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 26,1993, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she refused an offer of suitable employment without good cause.

Claimant, who worked as an operations manager for an employment placement service for four years, earned a yearly salary of $25,000 plus a few thousand dollars in commissions prior to losing her employment. She was subsequently offered a position as a sales representative for a health insurance company which paid a salary of $25,000 per year and included the use of a car and other benefits. Claimant refused the position due to the employer’s failure to accede to her request for a salary of $27,000 per year. In view of these facts, which are undisputed by the parties, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that petitioner refused suitable employment without good cause.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

217 A.D.2d 778, 629 N.Y.S.2d 123, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-monohan-nyappdiv-1995.