In re the Claim of Miller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Miller

49 A.D.2d 997, 374 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11332

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 997 (In re the Claim of Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Miller, 49 A.D.2d 997, 374 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 17, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that the claimant left her employment without good cause. What constitutes good cause for the leaving of employment is a question of fact and, if supported by substantial evidence as in the instant case, the finding of the board should not be disturbed (Matter of Scott [Catherwood] 31 AD2d 987). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 17, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining an initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that the claimant left her employment without good cause. What constitutes good cause for the leaving of employment is a question of fact and, if supported by substantial evidence as in the instant case, the finding of the board should not be disturbed (Matter of Scott [Catherwood] 31 AD2d 987). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Sweeney, Main, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 997, 374 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-miller-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack