In re the Claim of Mevorach

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Claim of Mevorach

51 A.D.2d 622, 377 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10961

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A.D.2d 622 (In re the Claim of Mevorach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Claim of Mevorach, 51 A.D.2d 622, 377 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10961 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 28, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective February 3, 1975 through May 11, 1975 because she failed to comply with registration requirements. The issue of whether claimant had [623]*623been misinformed concerning her eligibility for benefits when she allegedly telephoned the Cedarhurst office of the Industrial Commissioner was one which the board determined upon the credible evidence and was within its exclusive province (Matter of Bennett [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 946). Whether or not good cause existed for claimant’s failure to comply with the registration and reporting requirements is an issue of fact determined by the board (Matter of Zaimoff [Catherwood] 27 AD2d 782). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 28, 1975, which affirmed the decision of a referee sustaining the initial determination of the Industrial Commissioner holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective February 3, 1975 through May 11, 1975 because she failed to comply with registration requirements. The issue of whether claimant had [623]*623been misinformed concerning her eligibility for benefits when she allegedly telephoned the Cedarhurst office of the Industrial Commissioner was one which the board determined upon the credible evidence and was within its exclusive province (Matter of Bennett [Catherwood], 33 AD2d 946). Whether or not good cause existed for claimant’s failure to comply with the registration and reporting requirements is an issue of fact determined by the board (Matter of Zaimoff [Catherwood] 27 AD2d 782). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Koreman and Main, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A.D.2d 622, 377 N.Y.S.2d 810, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10961, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-claim-of-mevorach-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack